What is a mnemonic device? And how to use one? January 25, 2023 14:26

Words that can be nouns or verbs and change pronunciation January 20, 2023 14:50

This is a work in progress!

But here's the list:

• abstract
• accent
• addict
• address
• advocate
• ally
• annex
• attribute
• attribute
• combat
• combat
• commune
• compact
• compound
• compress
• conduct
• conduct
• confines
• conflict
• conflict
• conscript
• consort
• contest
• contract
• contract
• contrast
• converse
• convert
• convict
• decrease
• decrease
• desert
• detail
• discard
• discharge
• envelope
• escort
• escort
• exploit
• export
• extract
• finance
• fragment
• graduate
• impact
• impact
• imprint
• increase
• increase
• insert
• insult
• insult
• mandate
• object
• object
• overcharge
• overwork
• permit
• permit
• pervert
• prefix
• present
• present
• proceed
• proceeds
• process
• produce
• progress
• progress
• project
• project
• protest
• rampage
• rebel
• rebel
• recall
• recap
• record
• record
• refill
• refill
• refund
• refund
• refuse
• reject
• reject
• repeat
• replay
• subject
• subject
• survey
• suspect
• suspect
• torment
• transfer
• transplant
• transport
• upset

Example of a backgrounder or summary of information on a subject January 9, 2023 17:55

Tobacco smoking dates to the pre-Columbian era in the Americas. However, as its popularity increased, its legal status has varied greatly, not just in the US, but all over the world. In the United States, until about the 1990s, tobacco was effectively unregulated.

One of the reasons cigarette smoking became more popular was that it was seen as a glamorous habit. Tobacco companies paid for product placement in television shows, movies, and advertisements, which helped to promote the image of their product as glamorous or manly to a wider audience. In some cases, tobacco companies even paid actors to smoke their brands on screen.

It may seems ridiculous today, but in the mid-1900s, tobacco companies also ran ad campaigns to tout the healthful benefits of smoking. Some of these ads even included images of doctors smoking! One memorable slogan claimed that "[m]ore doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette."

Tobacco companies denied or downplayed the negative health effects of smoking, despite the fact that there was a growing body of scientific evidence linking smoking to a range of serious health problems, including lung cancer and death. In some cases, tobacco companies even funded research that intended to find no connection between smoking and disease. These companies also hid research that showed that smoking was harmful.

In the 1990s, the evidence that smoking was harmful continue to increase. Groups that advocated for the regulation of tobacco brought lawsuits against big tobacco companies which proved that the companies had deliberately withheld research that showed that tobacco was dangerous to a person's health. Over the course of a few years, more states passed laws restricting the sales of cigarettes to adults over the age of 18 and greatly increased taxes; for example, the average cost of a pack of cigarettes rose from less than $1 in 1980 to more than $7 in 2015.

In 2009, the US passed the Tobacco Control Act, which gives the Food and Drug Administration control over how tobacco is manufactured, marketed, and sold. For example, advertising that might appeal to children (such as using cartoon characters) is banned, and cigarette labels must devote more than 50% of their space to warning labels.

As a result of this increased regulation and public awareness, the percentage of smokers in the US has decreased from 45% in 1954 (meaning almost half of adults smoked in 1954!) to about 13% in 2020. Rates of lung cancer deaths have also decreased dramatically, from a peak around 1990 of about 91 deaths per 100,000 people to about 50 in 2015.

To make up for lost sales, tobacco companies have turned to markets outside the US to sell tobacco. For example, China is seen as a possible target for increased growth. And other "nicotine-delivery devices," such as electronic cigarettes, have gained in popularity, as well. For example, the vaping market exploded in 2010-2020, which in fact is already experiencing federal regulation in much the same way that tobacco has.

Adjectives November 8, 2022 14:42

SAT vocab: enigmatic February 17, 2022 11:16

What does enigmatic mean? Read below for the definition.

Quick vocab quiz for the word enigmatic

First, before you read about the word enigmatic, try this quick vocab quiz:

What the HSPT is, why it's important, and how to prepare for it October 21, 2021 18:32

HSPT Test Dates for the San Francisco Bay Area (2022) September 16, 2021 15:52

August 2021 SAT registration: No spots available July 6, 2021 13:10

When will registration for the August 28, 2021 open? May 31, 2021 15:41

Writing the hardship essay for your college application May 4, 2021 19:06

Your college essay: I don't know what to write! May 3, 2021 13:09

UC and CSU to require COVID-19 vaccinations April 23, 2021 13:51

The 5 ways COVID-19 is changing UC admissions May 27, 2020 16:00

SAT Test Dates during COVID-19 May 20, 2020 14:20

The world is undergoing massive upheaval, and few sectors of public life will experience the disruptions that education is currently seeing.

On this page, we track the ever-changing upcoming schedule of SAT tests.

Top 20 college applicants: Some activities that you should start ASAP April 16, 2020 11:38

5 things you can do right now to stand out April 10, 2020 12:01

Register early for the SAT July 22, 2019 18:13

Add more detail to your writing October 9, 2018 17:29

Most common essay mistakes: Avoid using informal words, such as "stuff" September 11, 2018 11:20

Most common SAT Essay mistakes: How to use the author's name September 3, 2018 15:01

August 25, 2018 SAT, the day a leaked SAT was used officially August 30, 2018 17:59

About the video: I was interviewed by ABC TV here in San Francisco about the SAT leak.

If you’re studying for the SAT now or have taken it recently, you’ve probably heard about the colossal failure on the part of College Board–the SAT given in August of 2018 was a repeat of an SAT given previously overseas.

To make matters worse, that test had apparently been “leaked” in PDF form to the Internet (probably as early as 2017), meaning that it was widely available to anyone who knew how or where to look for it. (I have never seen the test, but I have seen discussions online about it.)

College Board has a policy of not commenting on the “specifics of question usage and test administration schedules”, so this is all unconfirmed, but ample evidence supports the conclusion that it was the same SAT given in October 2017 in Asia.

Why it’s bad

I think it is fairly clear why reusing a large part or all of a previous SAT test is at best problematic and at worst massively unfair–those who have seen, taken, or practiced from that test before have an extreme advantage when taking the test.

One of the most common methods of studying is to take many practice tests and review them. If you’ve done your studying properly, you will see where you went wrong and remember your mistakes. If you happen to see that question again, or even a similar one, you should get that question right.

Furthermore, it is common in some places to “share” tests for studying purposes. In some cases, this “sharing” is done on a very large scale.

In a word, a very high number (but certainly not the majority) of students had seen, taken, and reviewed this particular test before they took it last August 25. But more students had not, and it is these students who are at a disadvantage.

How do we know that the SAT was leaked?

As I said above, College Board has not confirmed that the August 2018 SAT was recycled from October 2017, but there is simply too much anecdotal evidence showing that it was. Online, in the usual places, you can find people saying that they had seen the August test before.

A quick search of Twitter and Reddit shows:

And I’ve personally heard at least three different students tell me that someone in their test room last Saturday told them that they had seen the test before. For example, one test-taker announced, when the test was over and he was on his way out, that he had taken the test before, upon which the proctor politely dismissed the class except for that one test-taker. (Well done, sir!) Another student told me that, after the test, someone was showing people his copy of the test on his phone.

How do SATs get leaked?

Most people who take the SAT have never seen that test before. Or the questions on it.

However, that doesn’t mean that some people somewhere don’t have access to a particular test beforehand. In fact, there are entire operations devoted to getting copies of these tests or “reconstructing” them after they’re administered.

Here are the common ways that SATs (as well as a few other high-stakes tests) are compromised:

• A corrupt proctor steals a test or copies it during the administration of the test.
• Huge numbers of students take an official SAT; each is assigned a section to memorize and then recreate later that day back at the lair of the company that organized the group.
• A test-taker will covertly photograph pages of the test.
• A test-taker in one time zone will contact another test-taker elsewhere to divulge parts of the SAT.

For the record, I have not seen this happen anywhere in San Francisco, nor do I know anyone who has engaged in this sort of activity. But it does occur in some places.

What will College Board do?

This is turning out to be a public relations disaster for the nonprofit College Board. Especially after the controversy of the June SAT (that one was too easy, resulting in lower-than-expected scores), College Board needed to deliver a hitch-free testing experience in August. That didn’t happen.

College Board, again, is neither confirming nor denying the reuse of the test. However, they are stating that they will scrutinize the test answer sheets to find cheaters (my term, not theirs). This is actually standard practice for the College Board, but you can bet that they will be especially cautious for this test administration.

As of now, College Board is maintaining that nothing will change, and scores will be released as scheduled on Sep 7, 2018.

Some students fear that their scores will be canceled. (That's the rumor going around amongst the high school kids.) I honestly cannot envision that happening—there's simply too much at stake for too many people, and College Board can't just cancel the scores of the 200,000-300,000 people who took the SAT in August.

How does College Board determine cheating?

How does College Board decide that someone had previous access to the test? There are several ways that I have heard of over the years. First, College Board will look at your previous SAT or PSAT scores if you have them. If your score improvement is significant, College Board may decide to withhold your scores while they investigate further. In this case, you will get a notification from College Board informing you that they are going to examine your scores more closely.

The second method that I’ve heard about (and this was a while ago, so this may not happen any longer) is that College Board will compare your answers with those seated next to you. Presumably, if there’s too close a match, one of you will be suspect.

I can speculate on a third method, but it makes sense to me—a close analysis of your performance would indicate how you typically fare on certain question types. For example, if your weakness is permutations in math or inference questions in reading, and you suddely jump in those question types, your answer set may get flagged. Of course, if August was your first sitting of the test, this method would not work. (And again, I am only surmising here.)

So in terms of numbers, what sort of increase could trigger this warning? In the past, our students who have raised their scores about 500 points (yes, it’s possible with hard work) have been singled out. Fortunately, in all but one case, the students later had their scores released. (For the one whose scores were not released, the student admitted to me that he had had some sort of unfair advantage.)

In the end, however, no matter what College Board says, there will almost certainly be people who did not cheat who have their scores canceled and conversely, those who did who don’t get flagged.

The worst-case scenario and what to expect

If you’ve never taken the SAT or PSAT before, and you didn’t have access to the test beforehand, you should be safe.

However, if the following apply to you, you need to be prepared:

• You’ve taken the PSAT or SAT before before, and you studied really, really hard for the August test and had a good chance of raising your score. In other words, if you have a big (but legitimate) jump in scores between administrations, you may become suspect.
• You took the PSAT before and didn’t really try very hard, and in August, your score jumped.

Consequences—in the past, both with the SAT and other tests I’ve coached (GMAT, GRE, and TOEFL), the following could happen:

• A suspect set of responses could be withheld and then released as usual.
• A suspect set of responses could be withheld permanently, after which:
  • A student could be offered the chance to retake the SAT; presumably if the score is close, the student can keep her score (perhaps the higher score?).
  • A student’s scores could be canceled, and the student barred indefinitely from ever taking the SAT.

I’ve not heard of the last situation, neither with our students nor with students I’ve read about. However, there was a GMAT mini-scandal some years ago in which a handful of test-takers were banned from ever taking the GMAT again. (Please note that College Board is not associated with the GMAT in any way.)

Of course, if someone is prohibited from taking the SAT, he can just take the ACT instead. Or apply to U Chicago!

Why did College Board resuse the test?

College Board has largely remained mum on the subject, but has spoken about the need to reuse questions in the past, but not an entire test. The reason for reusing questions would be to cut costs—I’ve seen an estimate online that estimated that it could take up to 30 months and cost up to $1 million to prepare a single SAT test. College Board has also said that they can’t just whip up a new test in short order; presumably, it’s a lengthy process that needs to be planned far in advance.

While reusing a single test item or a handful is perhaps excusable, the reuse of an entire test is not. To make matters worse, as stated previously, this test was readily available online. (Note: A lot of people are stating that it was available only in Asia. I’d like to point out that if it’s on the Internet in Asia, it’s also online outside of Asia. Plenty of students outside of Asia had access to it.)

A reporter asked me why College Board would reuse an entire test. I’ll tell you the same thing I told her—no one but College Board knows for sure. However, my educated guess is that they were aware of the situation but could not reasonably cobble together an entire SAT in time to administer a new SAT in August. In this scenario, the alternative would have been to put out a sloppy, under-edited test, which would likely have put College Board in a very unfavorable situation. At least in this case, College Board can blame illicit behavior on some unknown bad actor.

I saw an old comment from College Board online that said that if they did use a new test for every administration, the cost of the SAT could double. People already complain about the SAT testing fees, so College Board is probably not too keen on raising that fee. I do know that the GMAT and GRE cost $250 and $205 respectively to take, so the SAT’s fee of $47.50 sure does seem inexpensive by comparison.

What will happen in the future?

For sure, the security of the SAT will increase in the future. College Board is already shipping some tests to certain testing sites in locked containers. This may mean more security while taking the test as well, though in this particular situation, that wouldn’t have helped a whit.

I can also only imagine College Board will attempt to speed up the process of moving the SAT to computer, which would be a massive undertaking and frankly, perhaps not feasible for the numbers involved with the SAT. For most of you reading this now, if the SAT moves to a computer-based test, it will likely happen long after you’re in college and are finished with the SAT stage of your lives. (I remember some rumors of moving the SAT to computer around 2000.)

It is also possible that universities will start requiring their own admissions tests; the University of California discussed this at some point back in 2001 (which was one of the reasons the SAT changed in 2005).

What will TestMagic do?

If you prepped with us for the August test, and you need to retake it, we’ve got your back! This applies to both students in our group classes and doing one-to-one tutoring with us. Just get in touch, and we’ll get you sorted.

Final thoughts

This story is still unfolding and there will surely be protests, petitions, complaints, and changes to come. We’ll keep you updated, and we also ask that you also get back to us if you’re one of our students. We’re here to help.

SAT Study Plan August 23, 2018 13:47

Where to download official SAT practice tests August 21, 2018 17:09

So you've heard that official SAT tests are the best source of SAT practice material.

Here's where to download them.

UC admissions for fall 2018: Brutal May 31, 2018 13:33